(Name (Professor (Subjectxx February 2008Moral ReflectionEveryday in our lives we ar forced into making object lesson decisions almost some(prenominal)thing under the sun . There are situations that make such(prenominal) wreak difficult , and thither are situations where the resolvent appears to be dear right in front of our faces . I conceive it would be difficult for anyone to go under on any respectable quandary if he has no clear idea of moralityPerson onlyy , I am aware that of at least two honest principles that delineate me in my effortless ethical decision-making . These are utilitarianism and Kantian moral philosophical system . utilitarianism holds that a someone s fermention would be get a lineed morally right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest direct of people . Thus , utilitarianism as a moral philosophy places emphasis on the consequences of human practiceion rather than on the motives behind such action (West . On the other go past Kantian moral philosophy , or more popularly known as the categorical imperative , is base on notions of obligation , necessity and reason Kant hoped that morality consists in the choosing and doing tight-laced top , and the proper action is bring downd all by discerning conceiveations . Thus , Kant holds that essential considerations including emotions , should not be considered in moral decision-making (The Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyI intrust in two these theories and I use them some(prenominal) when I descend everyday ethical dilemmas . There are times when . I believe purely rational considerations should prevail , but there are times that I also consider subjective factors bid emotions . I believe that both theories guide my actions and decisions , and both surrender me to weigh various considerations i n my mindNevertheless , I believe that Kant ! s method acting in determining the right conduct is a punter decision-making process , because Kant provded clear criteria for choosing .
Kant provided this rule , hence So act , that the rule on which thou actest would lease of macrocosm espouse as a law by all rational beings (KantThis rule is easier to follow since it does not falter dep last on my modality or subjective gustatory modality , which could change in any day . It serves as a true north which teaches all men how to think and decide moral dilemmasOne moral resultant that deeply concerns me is euthanasia , or mercy killing . euthanasia is define d as an act characterized by the intentional ending of a patient s animateness by a atomic number 101 , commonly by lethal injection (Religion Facts Euthanasia is continuously being raised as an option where a person is with a terminal illness and slim chances of recovering . It is an authorised step up for me because I could easily imagine myself in the beat of the ill person s family , and I could imagine subjective feelings that would dictate all euthanasia or maintaining life funding . In these kinds of situations , utilitarianism could support either position , as the decision would work away on the consequences of an action . On the other hand , Kantian philosophy could provide a more definitive behave , but such answer would definitely not consider emotions , because...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essa! y
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.